Consumo sostenible, ámbito social

Contenido principal del artículo

Neil Michael Ayala

Resumen

Esta revisión contribuye a un entendimiento más profundo sobre el significado de calidad de vida desde la perspectiva del consumo. Se presentan diferentes motivaciones de consumidores, asàcomo también la contribución de los ricos y pobres a los patrones no sustentables de consumo. Esta revisión abre la discusión sobre la compleja relación que existe entre consumo, valores, identidad y los mecanismos para hacer decisiones de compra en un contexto globalizado y a la luz de la literatura relacionada. Modelos económicos más locales y simples son descritos como estrategias positivas por considerarlas formas nuevas de percibir un estilo de vida más simple y más local como positivo para el ambiente. Esta revisión enfatiza la importancia de los valores culturales y éticos, los cuales están directamente ligados a los patrones de consumo.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
1.
Ayala NM. Consumo sostenible, ámbito social. REMCB [Internet]. 21 de mayo de 2018 [citado 23 de abril de 2024];39(1). Disponible en: https://remcb-puce.edu.ec/remcb/article/view/563
Sección
Artículos de Revisión

Citas

Acosta A. 2013. Construir el Buen Vivir -Sumak Kawsay. La Línea de fuego. Enero 8, 2013. Available at: https://lalineadefuego.info/2013/01/08/construir-el-buen-vivir-sumak-kawsay-por-alberto-acosta/ Accessed in December 2017.

Adbusters 2011. About Adbusters, (on line) Available from: http://www.adbusters.org/about/adbusters (October 2012).

[ALAI] Agencia Latinoamericana de Información. 2016. Los alimentos no son mercancía. Quito. Fundación Agencia Latinoamericana de Información.

Andrade M. P. 2017. Los Sistemas Participativos de Garantía en el Ecuador. Aproximaciones a su desarrollo. Letras Verdes. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales 22: 120–145. https://doi.org/10.17141/letrasverdes.22.2017.2679

Australian Government. 2010. Living greener. Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency. Available from: http://www.livinggreener.gov.au/

Auty S, Elliot R. 2001. Beinglike or being liked: Identity Vs. Approval in a Social Context. Advances in Consumer Research. 28. Available from: http://www.acrwebsite.org/search/view-conference-proceedings.aspx?Id=8475 Accessed on Dec 2017.

Black Friday. 2011. Available from: http://www.blackfriday2011.com/

Black Friday y Cyber Monday: entre descuentos, bomba y un plan de compras. 2017 November 07. El Universo; section Economía. Available at: https://www.eluniverso.com/noticias/2017/11/07/nota/6468829/black-friday-cyber-moday-ecuador-descuentos-bomba-plan-compras

Brangwyn B, Hopkins R. 2008. Transition Initiatives Primer – becoming a Transition Town, City, District, Village, Community or even Island, Transition Network (on line) Available from: http://www.bankofideas.com.au/Downloads/TransitionInitiativesPrimer.pdf

Burgess J. 2003. Sustainable consumption: Is it really achievable? Consumer Policy Review 13(3):78-84.

Gerbens-Leenes W, Moll H.C. 2006. Pathways toward Sustainable Food Consumption Patterns. In: Charter M, Tukker A, editors. Proceedings of the referred sessions I. Sustainable consumption and production: opportunities and challenges. Launch Conference of the Sustainable Consumption Research Exchange (SCORE!) Network. Wuppertal, Germany. Available from: http://www.score-network.org/files/1222_SCORE-Launch-Conf_Proceedings-Refereed-Papers-Icorr.pdf

Commonwealth of Australia. 2011. Clean Energy Future, securing a clean energy future.

Dittmar H. 2005. A new look at compulsive buying; self-discrepancies and materialistic values as predictors of a compulsive buying tendency, Journal of social and clinical psychology 24 (6):832- 859.

Feola G. 2016. Trans local grassroots movements and the geography of sustainability transitions: the case of Transition Towns Network. Conference proceedings. 7th International sustainability transitions (IST) Conference 2016. Exploring Transition Research as Transformative Science, 6th-9th September 2016, Wuppertal, Germany.

Fuchs D. 2016. Sustainable consumption. In: Falkner R, editor. The Handbook of Global and Environmental Policy. John Wiley & Sons. Hoboken, New Jersey. 215-230 p.

Gazi U, Khorshed A, Gow J. 2016. Does Ecological Footprint Impede Economic Growth? An Empirical Analysis Based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis. Australian Economic Papers 55(3): 301-316.

Go Green 2018. Available From: http://www.go-green.ae/footprint/countries.php (accessed April 2018).

Gortaire R. 2016. Agroecología en el Ecuador. Proceso histórico, logros y desafíos. Antropología Cuadernos de Investigación 17: 39-55.

ISO 2018. ISO 14040: 2006- Environmental management- Life Cycle Assessment. Principles and framework.

León X. 2017. El Buen Vivir como alternativa al desarrollo y su relación con la Soberanía Alimentaria. El caso ecuatoriano. Antropología Cuadernos de Investigación 17:39-55.

Lozano S, Gutiérrez E. 2008. Non-parametric frontier approach to modeling the relationships among population, GDP, energy consumption and CO2 emissions, Ecological Economics 66(4): 678-699.

McCoy K, Meyer Z. Dec. 26, 2017. U.S. Retail holiday sales jump 4.9%, biggest increase since 2011. USA Today, on line edition. Available from: https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2017/12/26/u-s-retail-holiday-sales-jump-4-9-biggest-increase-since-2011/981464001/

Mitchell B. 1997. Resource and Environmental Management, Longman limited, Essex, UK.

Mortensen L.F. 2006. Sustainable household consumption in Europe. Consumer Policy Review 16(4): 141-148.

Norberg-Hodge H. 2011. The Economics of Happiness (Motion Picture), International Society for Ecology and Culture, a film by Norberg-Hodge H, Gorelick S, Page J. Berkeley, California.

Nynäs P, Pessi A. 2012. Relocating and Negotiating the Sacred: The Reception of a Chapel in a Shopping Mall. In: Gómez L, Van Herck W, editors. The sacred in the city. Religious Studies Monograph. Continuum International Publishing Group. London: 161-190 p.

Occupy Together, 2011, LIVE: Intro to Direct Democracy & Facilitation Training, (on line) Available from: http://www.occupytogether.org/

[OECD] Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2008. Promoting Sustainable Consumption Good Practices in OECD countries. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/40317373.pdf. Accessed December 2017.

Queensland Government. 2009. Low carbon lifestyle tips, DERM, Brisbane.

[SD21] Sustainable Development in the 21st century. 2012. Review of implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio Principles, Synthesis. Study prepared by the Stakeholder Forum for a Sustainable Future.

Schumacher E.F. 1974. Small is Beautiful. Sphere Books Ltd, London.

Shiva V, Emmott B. 2000. Is 'development' good for the third world? The Ecologist 30(2): 22.

The Australian Government’s Climate Change Plan. Camberra.

The Balance. 2017. What it is, when it starts and current trends, ‘Cyber Monday’. Available from: https://www.thebalance.com/cyber-monday-what-it-is-when-it-starts-and-current-trends-3305715

[UNEP] United Nations Environmental Program. 2010. Sustainable Consumption Production and Development, Background Papers, Division for Technology, Industry and Economics. Paris 2010.

UNESCO. 2010. Teaching and learning for a sustainable future. Available from: http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/mods/theme_b/mod09.html

United Nations Conference on Environmental Development. 1992. Agenda 21-Chapter 4 Changing Consumption Patterns, Earth Summit 1992. Available from: http://www.un-documents.net/a21-04.htm .

World Integrated Trade Solution-World Bank. 2010. Available from: https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/ECU/StartYear/2006/EndYear/2010/Indicator/NY-GDP-PCAP-KD

Zhang XP & Cheng XM. 2009. Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecological Economics. 68(10): 2706-2712.