Control biológico de babosas con el nemátodo rhabditido Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita

Contenido principal del artículo

Aní­bal Franco Cóndor Golec

Resumen

Esta revisión literaria se basa en control biológico de babosas usando el nemátodo Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita. Se describe la efectividad y modo de acción del nematodo según el ambiente. Además de su método de aplicación y dosis, comparado con molusquicidas quí­micos y el estudio a la bacterias al cual se asocia. P. hermaphrodita preferirí­a condiciones de suelo húmedas y actúa en babosas en estado juvenil de la especie Deroceras. Las aplicaciones parciales del nemátodo son menos costosas y deberí­an hacerse en lugares donde las babosas descansan. Existen otras especies de nemátodos controladores, no siendo efectivas para el control de babosas. Se requiere mayor investigación para probar en que momento actúa el nemátodo P. hermaphrodita pues no ha sido tan efectivo para el control de otras especies de babosas.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
1.
Cóndor Golec AF. Control biológico de babosas con el nemátodo rhabditido Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita. REMCB [Internet]. 25 de mayo de 2020 [citado 20 de abril de 2024];41(1). Disponible en: https://remcb-puce.edu.ec/remcb/article/view/836
Sección
Artículos de Revisión

Citas

Cross JV, Easterbrook AM , Crook, AM, Crook, D, Fitzgerald, JD, Innocenzi, PJ, Jay, CN, Solomon, MG. 2001. Review: natural enemies and biocontrol of pests of strawberry in northern and central Europe. Biocontrol Science and Technology 11: 165-216.

Dörler D, ScheucherA, Zaller J. 2019. Efficacy of chemical and biological slug control measures in response to watering and earthwormsScientific Reports [Internet]. [Cited 2019 Jun 16]; 9: 2954. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41598-019-39585-5

El-Danasoury H, Iglesias-Piñeira J 2017. Performance of the slug parasitic nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita under predicted conditions of winter warming. Journal of Pesticide Science 42(2): 62-66.

Ester A, Huiting HF, Molendijk, LPG,Vlaswinkel MET. 2003. The rhabditid nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita Schneider as a potential biological agent to control field slugs Deroceras reticulatum (Muller) in Brussels sprouts. In: Slug and Snail Pests in agriculture, BCPC Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 80. p. 313-318.

Ester A, Geelen PMTM.1996. Integrated control of slugs in a sugar beet crop growing in a rye cover crop. In: Slug and Snail Pests in agriculture, BCPC Symposium Proceedings, Vol 66, pp. 445-172.

Ester A, van Rozen K, Molendijk LPG. 2003. Field experiments using the rhabditid nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita salt as control measures against slugs in green asparagus. Crop Protection 22: 689-695.

Frank T. 1998. The role of different slug species in damage to oilseed rape bordering on sown wildflower strips. Annals of Applied Biology 133: 483-493.

Glen DM, Wilson MF, Wiltshire CW. 1989. Effects of seed-bed conditions on slug numbers and damage to winter wheat in a clay soil. Annals of Applied Biology 115: 177-190.

Glen DM, Wilson MJ, Hughes L, Cargeeg, P, Hajjar A. 1996. Exploring and exploiting the potential of the rhabditid nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita as a biocontrol agent for slugs. Integrated control of slugs in a sugar beet crop growing in a rye cover crop. In: Slug and Snail Pests in agriculture, BCPC Symposium Proceedings, Vol 66, p. 271-280.

Grewal SK,Grewal PS. 2003. Effect of osmotic desiccation on longevity and temperature tolerance of Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita (Nematoda: Rhabditidae). Journal of Parasitology 89 (3): 434-438.

Grewal P S, Grewal SK, Taylor RAJ, Hammond RB. 2001. Application of molluscicidal nematodes to slugs shelters: a novel approach to economic biological control of slugs. Biological control 22: 72-80.

Grubisic D, Ostrec L, Dusak I. 2003. Biological control of slugs in vegetable crops in Croatia. In: Slug and Snail Pests in agriculture, BCPC Symposium Proceedings, Vol 80, pp. 115-120.

Hass B, Glen DM, Brain P, Hughes LA. 1999. Targeting biocontrol with the slug-parasite nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita in slug feeding areas: a model study. Biocontrol Science and Technology 9: 587-598.

Huiting H, Ester A. 2001. Slakken moelijk uit spruiten te houden. Groenten Fruit 30: 34-35.

Iglesias J, Castillejo J, Castro R.2000. Field test using the nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita for biocontrol of slugs in Spain. Biocontrol Science and Technology 11: 93-98.

Kaya H. 2001. Molluscicidal nematodes for biological control of pest slugs [Internet]. Slosson report 2000-2001. University of California. USA. [Cited 2020 May 24]. Available from: Slosson. ucdavis.edu/ newsletters/Kaya_ 200129028. pdfMcKemey AR, Glen DM, WiltshireCW, Symondson WOC. 2006. Molecular quantification of slug density in the soil using monoclonal antibodies. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38(9): 2903-2909.

MacMillan K, Haukeland S, Rae R, Young I, Crawford J, Hapca S, Wilson M. 2009. Dispersal patterns and behaviour of the nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita in mineral soils and organic media. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 41(7): 1483-1490.

Nermut J, Půža ,Mráček Z. 2014. The effect of different growing substrates on the development and quality of Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita (Nematoda: Rhabditidae). Biocontrol Science and Technology 24(9): 1026-1038.

Port GR, Collier RH, Symondson WOC, Bohan, DA, Glen DM. 2003. Progress in improving the prediction and integrated control of slug damage in horticultural crops. In: Slug and Snail Pests in agriculture, BCPC Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 80.p. 301-306.

South A. 1992. Terrestrial slugs, biology, ecology and control, London: Chapman and Hall. 428 p.

Speiser B, Andermatt M. 1996. Field trials with Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita in Switzerland. In: Slug and Snail Pests in agriculture, BCPC Symposium Proceedings. Vol. 66.p.419-424.

Speiser B, Zaller JG, Neudecker A. 2001. Size- specific susceptibility of the pest slugs Deroceras reticulatum and Arion lusitanicus to the nematode biocontrol agent Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita. Biocontrol 46: 311-320.

Speiser B. Glen D, Piggot S, Ester A, Davies K, Castillejo J, Coupland J. 2001. Slug damage and control of slugs in horticultural crops. Project: Novel technologies for integrated control of slug damage in key horticultural crops. [Internet] Partners: LARS, MicroBio Ltd., Applied Plant Research, IACR, FiBL, Department of Animal Biology - University of Santiago, Farm Forest Research. [Cited 2019 Jun 14]. Available from: Https://core.ac.uk/download/ pdf/10919097.pdf

Tan L Grewal S. 2001. Pathogenicity of Moraxella osloensis, a bacterium associated with the nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita, to the slug Deroceras reticulatum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 67(11): 5010-5016.

Wilson MJ, Glen DM George SK. 1993. The rhabditid nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita as a potential biological control agent for slugs. Biocontrol Science and Technology. 3: 503-511.

Wilson MJ, Hughes LA., Jefferies D Glen DM. 1999. Slugs (Deroceras reticulatum and Arion ater agg.) avoid soil treated with the rhabditid nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita. Biological control 16: 170-176.

Wilson MJ, Glen DM, George SK Hughes LA. 1995. Biocontrol of slugs in protected lettuce using the rhabditid nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita. Biocontrol Science and Technology 5: 233-242.

Wilson M Gaugler R (n.d.). Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita (Rhabditida: Rhabditidae). [Internet].In: Biological Control: A guide to natural enemies in North America. Anthony Shelton editor. Cornell University. USA. [Cited 2019 Jun 16]. Available from: https://biocontrol.entomology. cornell.edu/pathogens/phasmarhabditis.php .

Wilson M Rae R. 2015. Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita as a Control Agent for Slugs.

[Internet]. In: Nematode Pathogenesis of Insects and Other Pests. Sustainability in Plant and Crop Protection. Raquel Campos Herrera editor. Springer International Publishing. Switzerland. [Cited 2019 Jun 16]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/ chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-18266-7_21.