Sustainable consumption, the social dimension

Main Article Content

Neil Michael Ayala

Abstract

This review contributes to a deeper understanding of what quality of life means from a sustainable consumption perspective. Different motivations of consumers, and the contributions of the rich and poor to unsustainable patterns of consumption are presented. This paper opens the discussion around the complex relationship between consumption, values, identity and mechanisms for making purchase choices in a globalized context, and under the light of relevant literature. Smaller and more localized economic models are described as positive strategies for considering new ways of perceiving a simpler and more local lifestyle as positive to the environment. This paper emphasizes the importance of cultural and ethical values, which are directly linked to patters of consumption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Ayala NM. Sustainable consumption, the social dimension. REMCB [Internet]. 2018May21 [cited 2024Jul.3];39(1). Available from: https://remcb-puce.edu.ec/remcb/article/view/563
Section
Artículos de Revisión

References

Acosta A. 2013. Construir el Buen Vivir -Sumak Kawsay. La Línea de fuego. Enero 8, 2013. Available at: https://lalineadefuego.info/2013/01/08/construir-el-buen-vivir-sumak-kawsay-por-alberto-acosta/ Accessed in December 2017.

Adbusters 2011. About Adbusters, (on line) Available from: http://www.adbusters.org/about/adbusters (October 2012).

[ALAI] Agencia Latinoamericana de Información. 2016. Los alimentos no son mercancía. Quito. Fundación Agencia Latinoamericana de Información.

Andrade M. P. 2017. Los Sistemas Participativos de Garantía en el Ecuador. Aproximaciones a su desarrollo. Letras Verdes. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales 22: 120–145. https://doi.org/10.17141/letrasverdes.22.2017.2679

Australian Government. 2010. Living greener. Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency. Available from: http://www.livinggreener.gov.au/

Auty S, Elliot R. 2001. Beinglike or being liked: Identity Vs. Approval in a Social Context. Advances in Consumer Research. 28. Available from: http://www.acrwebsite.org/search/view-conference-proceedings.aspx?Id=8475 Accessed on Dec 2017.

Black Friday. 2011. Available from: http://www.blackfriday2011.com/

Black Friday y Cyber Monday: entre descuentos, bomba y un plan de compras. 2017 November 07. El Universo; section Economía. Available at: https://www.eluniverso.com/noticias/2017/11/07/nota/6468829/black-friday-cyber-moday-ecuador-descuentos-bomba-plan-compras

Brangwyn B, Hopkins R. 2008. Transition Initiatives Primer – becoming a Transition Town, City, District, Village, Community or even Island, Transition Network (on line) Available from: http://www.bankofideas.com.au/Downloads/TransitionInitiativesPrimer.pdf

Burgess J. 2003. Sustainable consumption: Is it really achievable? Consumer Policy Review 13(3):78-84.

Gerbens-Leenes W, Moll H.C. 2006. Pathways toward Sustainable Food Consumption Patterns. In: Charter M, Tukker A, editors. Proceedings of the referred sessions I. Sustainable consumption and production: opportunities and challenges. Launch Conference of the Sustainable Consumption Research Exchange (SCORE!) Network. Wuppertal, Germany. Available from: http://www.score-network.org/files/1222_SCORE-Launch-Conf_Proceedings-Refereed-Papers-Icorr.pdf

Commonwealth of Australia. 2011. Clean Energy Future, securing a clean energy future.

Dittmar H. 2005. A new look at compulsive buying; self-discrepancies and materialistic values as predictors of a compulsive buying tendency, Journal of social and clinical psychology 24 (6):832- 859.

Feola G. 2016. Trans local grassroots movements and the geography of sustainability transitions: the case of Transition Towns Network. Conference proceedings. 7th International sustainability transitions (IST) Conference 2016. Exploring Transition Research as Transformative Science, 6th-9th September 2016, Wuppertal, Germany.

Fuchs D. 2016. Sustainable consumption. In: Falkner R, editor. The Handbook of Global and Environmental Policy. John Wiley & Sons. Hoboken, New Jersey. 215-230 p.

Gazi U, Khorshed A, Gow J. 2016. Does Ecological Footprint Impede Economic Growth? An Empirical Analysis Based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis. Australian Economic Papers 55(3): 301-316.

Go Green 2018. Available From: http://www.go-green.ae/footprint/countries.php (accessed April 2018).

Gortaire R. 2016. Agroecología en el Ecuador. Proceso histórico, logros y desafíos. Antropología Cuadernos de Investigación 17: 39-55.

ISO 2018. ISO 14040: 2006- Environmental management- Life Cycle Assessment. Principles and framework.

León X. 2017. El Buen Vivir como alternativa al desarrollo y su relación con la Soberanía Alimentaria. El caso ecuatoriano. Antropología Cuadernos de Investigación 17:39-55.

Lozano S, Gutiérrez E. 2008. Non-parametric frontier approach to modeling the relationships among population, GDP, energy consumption and CO2 emissions, Ecological Economics 66(4): 678-699.

McCoy K, Meyer Z. Dec. 26, 2017. U.S. Retail holiday sales jump 4.9%, biggest increase since 2011. USA Today, on line edition. Available from: https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2017/12/26/u-s-retail-holiday-sales-jump-4-9-biggest-increase-since-2011/981464001/

Mitchell B. 1997. Resource and Environmental Management, Longman limited, Essex, UK.

Mortensen L.F. 2006. Sustainable household consumption in Europe. Consumer Policy Review 16(4): 141-148.

Norberg-Hodge H. 2011. The Economics of Happiness (Motion Picture), International Society for Ecology and Culture, a film by Norberg-Hodge H, Gorelick S, Page J. Berkeley, California.

Nynäs P, Pessi A. 2012. Relocating and Negotiating the Sacred: The Reception of a Chapel in a Shopping Mall. In: Gómez L, Van Herck W, editors. The sacred in the city. Religious Studies Monograph. Continuum International Publishing Group. London: 161-190 p.

Occupy Together, 2011, LIVE: Intro to Direct Democracy & Facilitation Training, (on line) Available from: http://www.occupytogether.org/

[OECD] Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2008. Promoting Sustainable Consumption Good Practices in OECD countries. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/40317373.pdf. Accessed December 2017.

Queensland Government. 2009. Low carbon lifestyle tips, DERM, Brisbane.

[SD21] Sustainable Development in the 21st century. 2012. Review of implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio Principles, Synthesis. Study prepared by the Stakeholder Forum for a Sustainable Future.

Schumacher E.F. 1974. Small is Beautiful. Sphere Books Ltd, London.

Shiva V, Emmott B. 2000. Is 'development' good for the third world? The Ecologist 30(2): 22.

The Australian Government’s Climate Change Plan. Camberra.

The Balance. 2017. What it is, when it starts and current trends, ‘Cyber Monday’. Available from: https://www.thebalance.com/cyber-monday-what-it-is-when-it-starts-and-current-trends-3305715

[UNEP] United Nations Environmental Program. 2010. Sustainable Consumption Production and Development, Background Papers, Division for Technology, Industry and Economics. Paris 2010.

UNESCO. 2010. Teaching and learning for a sustainable future. Available from: http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/mods/theme_b/mod09.html

United Nations Conference on Environmental Development. 1992. Agenda 21-Chapter 4 Changing Consumption Patterns, Earth Summit 1992. Available from: http://www.un-documents.net/a21-04.htm .

World Integrated Trade Solution-World Bank. 2010. Available from: https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/ECU/StartYear/2006/EndYear/2010/Indicator/NY-GDP-PCAP-KD

Zhang XP & Cheng XM. 2009. Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecological Economics. 68(10): 2706-2712.