analysis of normal and deleterious genes concerning fecundity in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster
Article Sidebar
Published:
May 8, 2023
Keywords:
Drosophila, lethal genes, fecundity
Main Article Content
Abstract
The effect of normal and deleterious genes on fecundity was studied in six natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster; Using the CyL/Pm technique, widely used in Drosophila in similar analyses, depending on the population, the number of normal, deleterious and lethal genes varied in each population and we refer to them on this occasion. Chromosomes were grouped into free and carriers of lethal and/or delaterous genes. These groups are the basis of the comparisons made using the Student's "t" test. for this, the average fertility of each population was obtained and from this fertility categories were constructed. Each chromosome was assigned to one of them, thus obtaining the relative frequencies for each category. In all cases in which chromosomes carrying or free of lethal genes were compared, the differences favored those free of lethal ones.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
1.
Salceda V. analysis of normal and deleterious genes concerning fecundity in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. REMCB [Internet]. 2023May8 [cited 2024Jul.3];44(1). Available from: https://remcb-puce.edu.ec/remcb/article/view/957
Issue
Section
Artículos Científicos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Band, H.T. 1963. Genetic structure of populations. II. Viabilities and variances of
heterozygotes in constant and fluctuating environments. Evolution 17: 307-319.
Band, H.T. 1964. Genetic structure of populations. III. Natural selection and concealed
variability in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 18: 384-404.
Band, H.T. and Ives, P.T. 1963. Genetic structure of populations. I. On the nature of
the genetic load in South Amberst population of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 17: 198-215.
Bokor, K. and Pecsenje, K. 2004. Differences in the effectof ethanol on fertility and viability components among laboratory strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas 132(3):215-227.
Carson, H.L. 1969. Maintenance of lethal and detrimental genes in natural
populations. Japanese Journal of. Genetics 44 (suppl. 1): 225-227.
Da Cunha, A.B. 1968. Maintenance of lethal and detrimental genes in natural
populations. Procedings. of the XII International. Congress of. Genetics 2: 162-163.
Falk, R. 1967. Fitness of heterozygotes in Drosophila. Mutation Research. 4: 805- 819.
Falk, R. and Ben.Zeev, N. 1966. Viability of heterozygotes for induced mutations in
Drosophila melanogaster. II. Mean effects in irradiated autosomes. Genetics 53: 65-77.
Fowler, K, C. Semple, N.H. Barton and L.P. Partridge. 1997. Genetic variation for total
fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings Biological Sciences 264: 191-199.
Gardner, M.P., Fowler, K., Barton, N.H and Partridge, L.P. 2005. Genetic variation for total
fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 169: 1553-1571.
Gardner, M.P., Fowler, K., Partridge, L.P. and Barton, N.H. 2001. Genetic variation for preadult viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 55(8): 1609-1620.
Kitagawa, O. 1967. Interaction in fitness between lethal genes in heterozygous
condition in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 57: 809-820.
Leips, J., P. Gilligan and Mackay, T.F.C. 2006. Quantitative trait loci with age-specific effects on fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 172: 1595-1605.
Mukai, T., Yoshikawa, I. and Saito, K. 1966. The genetic structure of natural
populations of Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Heterozygous effects of radiation-
induced mutations on viability in various genetic backgrounds. Genetics 53: 513-527.
Petit, C. and Nouaud, D.1984. The maintenance of the lethal gene curly in experimental
populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 53: 260-281.
Salceda, V. M. 1967. Recessive lethals in second chromosomes of Drosophila
melanogaster, with radiation stories. Genetics 57: 691-699.
Salceda, V.M. 1985. Viability effect of lethal and non-lethal II chromosomes of
irradiated Drosophila melanogaster populations. Archives. Biologiest. Nauka, Beograd 37 (1-4): 27-32.
Sánchez, P.J.L., Salceda, V.M. y Molina, J. 1974. Efecto de genes letales recesivos en
posición trans en el cromosoma II de Drosophila melanogaster (Meigen) sobre
algunos componentes de valor adaptativo. Agrociencia 16: 75-82.
Sankaranarayanan, K. 1966. Some components of genetic load in irradiated
experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 54: 121-139.
Savic-Vesilinovc, M., Pavkovic-Lucic, S., Kerbalijc-Novicic, Z., Jelic, M. and Andelkovic. M. 2013. Sexual selection can reduce mutational load in Drosophila subobscura. Genetika 45(2): 537-552.
Sgro, C.M. and Partridge, L. 2000. Evolutionary responses of the life history of wild-caught Drosophila melanogaster to two standard methods of laboratory culture. American Naturalist 156(4): 341-353.
Simmons, M.J., Sheldom, E.W. and Crow, J.F. 1978. Heterozygous effects of fitness
of EMS treated chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 88: 575-590.
Wallace B. 1956. Studies on irradiated populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
Journal of Genetics 54:280-293.
Wallace B. 1958. The average effect of radiation induced mutations on viability in
Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 12: 532-552.
Wallace, B. and Madden C. 1953. The frequency of sub an supervitals in experimental
populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 38: 456-470.
Yamazaki, T. 1984. Measurement of fitness and its components in six laboratory strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 108: 201-211.
heterozygotes in constant and fluctuating environments. Evolution 17: 307-319.
Band, H.T. 1964. Genetic structure of populations. III. Natural selection and concealed
variability in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 18: 384-404.
Band, H.T. and Ives, P.T. 1963. Genetic structure of populations. I. On the nature of
the genetic load in South Amberst population of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 17: 198-215.
Bokor, K. and Pecsenje, K. 2004. Differences in the effectof ethanol on fertility and viability components among laboratory strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas 132(3):215-227.
Carson, H.L. 1969. Maintenance of lethal and detrimental genes in natural
populations. Japanese Journal of. Genetics 44 (suppl. 1): 225-227.
Da Cunha, A.B. 1968. Maintenance of lethal and detrimental genes in natural
populations. Procedings. of the XII International. Congress of. Genetics 2: 162-163.
Falk, R. 1967. Fitness of heterozygotes in Drosophila. Mutation Research. 4: 805- 819.
Falk, R. and Ben.Zeev, N. 1966. Viability of heterozygotes for induced mutations in
Drosophila melanogaster. II. Mean effects in irradiated autosomes. Genetics 53: 65-77.
Fowler, K, C. Semple, N.H. Barton and L.P. Partridge. 1997. Genetic variation for total
fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings Biological Sciences 264: 191-199.
Gardner, M.P., Fowler, K., Barton, N.H and Partridge, L.P. 2005. Genetic variation for total
fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 169: 1553-1571.
Gardner, M.P., Fowler, K., Partridge, L.P. and Barton, N.H. 2001. Genetic variation for preadult viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 55(8): 1609-1620.
Kitagawa, O. 1967. Interaction in fitness between lethal genes in heterozygous
condition in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 57: 809-820.
Leips, J., P. Gilligan and Mackay, T.F.C. 2006. Quantitative trait loci with age-specific effects on fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 172: 1595-1605.
Mukai, T., Yoshikawa, I. and Saito, K. 1966. The genetic structure of natural
populations of Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Heterozygous effects of radiation-
induced mutations on viability in various genetic backgrounds. Genetics 53: 513-527.
Petit, C. and Nouaud, D.1984. The maintenance of the lethal gene curly in experimental
populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 53: 260-281.
Salceda, V. M. 1967. Recessive lethals in second chromosomes of Drosophila
melanogaster, with radiation stories. Genetics 57: 691-699.
Salceda, V.M. 1985. Viability effect of lethal and non-lethal II chromosomes of
irradiated Drosophila melanogaster populations. Archives. Biologiest. Nauka, Beograd 37 (1-4): 27-32.
Sánchez, P.J.L., Salceda, V.M. y Molina, J. 1974. Efecto de genes letales recesivos en
posición trans en el cromosoma II de Drosophila melanogaster (Meigen) sobre
algunos componentes de valor adaptativo. Agrociencia 16: 75-82.
Sankaranarayanan, K. 1966. Some components of genetic load in irradiated
experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 54: 121-139.
Savic-Vesilinovc, M., Pavkovic-Lucic, S., Kerbalijc-Novicic, Z., Jelic, M. and Andelkovic. M. 2013. Sexual selection can reduce mutational load in Drosophila subobscura. Genetika 45(2): 537-552.
Sgro, C.M. and Partridge, L. 2000. Evolutionary responses of the life history of wild-caught Drosophila melanogaster to two standard methods of laboratory culture. American Naturalist 156(4): 341-353.
Simmons, M.J., Sheldom, E.W. and Crow, J.F. 1978. Heterozygous effects of fitness
of EMS treated chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 88: 575-590.
Wallace B. 1956. Studies on irradiated populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
Journal of Genetics 54:280-293.
Wallace B. 1958. The average effect of radiation induced mutations on viability in
Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 12: 532-552.
Wallace, B. and Madden C. 1953. The frequency of sub an supervitals in experimental
populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 38: 456-470.
Yamazaki, T. 1984. Measurement of fitness and its components in six laboratory strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 108: 201-211.